EU stalemate on workers' rights by Finance News Bulletin

Published: 15/12/07

EU ministers meeting in Brussels have failed to arrive at an agreement on legislation that would give novel employment rights to organization workersThe new EU directive would give temporary workers, such as those employed through agencies, similar rights to permanent employeesBritain opposed the proposals, arguing it would damage the country's supple labour market and strike jobsMinisters also failed to agree on conditions for an opt-out from a maximum 48-hour labor week as part of the EU's working occasion directive

Business Secretary John Hutton said the UK administration had not been isolated in its resistance, with countries such as Germany and Malta also expressing concern"This is a litmus test of Europe's aptitude to equilibrium the legitimate need for employment security, which we clearly accept, with the container for Europe to be as effective and competitive as it perhaps can," Mr Hutton saidThere is a genuine threat that the bureaucracy and uncertainty that the directive would bring about would make employers think two times about using agency workersSupporters consider it has made the economy more supple, and the Confederation of British Industry (CBI) has warned any changes to agency personnel' rights could cost a quarter of a million UK jobsTom Hadley, from the staffing and service Confederation, which represents recruitment agencies, told the BBC the novel rights would put employers off using temporary staff

"There is a real threat that the system of government and uncertainty that the directive would transport about would make employers think twice about by agency workers and that, in our view, isn't good for companies, and it's surely not good for individual workers either"But the Trades Union assembly (TUC) says it is unfair that agency workers lack the same human rights as permanent employeesThe CBI said when the national smallest amount wage was about to be introduced that it would result in enormous loss of jobs and, of course, it didn'tIt wants the administration to accept the new agency workers instruction, which would stop temporary employees receiving less pay, training and pensions and less holidays than around the clock staffSarah Veale, the TUC's head of equality and employment, said the example of the national minimum salary showed that increasing workers' human rights did not necessarily mean job losses

"The employers' organisation, the CBI, said when the national minimum salary was about to be introduced that it would result in huge loss of jobs and, of course, it didn't"In information if anything employment levels went up after that, so I don't believe the TUC buys the argument that having protection and basic, polite terms and conditions of work for agency workers would denote that we'd lose that flexibility or lose

Visit original article: